<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Geek for God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekforgod.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekforgod.com</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a Christian geek</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Making SVN trust a new root CA certificate by Kasper</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/12/01/making-svn-trust-a-new-root-ca-certificate/comment-page-1/#comment-40436</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/12/01/making-svn-trust-a-new-root-ca-certificate/#comment-40436</guid>
		<description>Hello Robin,

I noticed that you store the converted certificate as &lt;code&gt;/etc/ssl/certs/cacert-root-ca.&lt;b&gt;pem&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/code&gt; while you refer to it as &lt;code&gt;ssl-authority-files = /etc/ssl/certs/cacert-root-ca.&lt;b&gt;crt&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/code&gt; in ~/.subversion/servers.

Is this intentional or an omission?

With kind Regards,
Kasper van den Berg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Robin,</p>
<p>I noticed that you store the converted certificate as <code>/etc/ssl/certs/cacert-root-ca.<b>pem</b></code> while you refer to it as <code>ssl-authority-files = /etc/ssl/certs/cacert-root-ca.<b>crt</b></code> in ~/.subversion/servers.</p>
<p>Is this intentional or an omission?</p>
<p>With kind Regards,<br />
Kasper van den Berg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I will no longer do business with Wachovia Bank by Robin Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2009/07/01/why-i-will-no-longer-do-business-with-wachovia-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-40202</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/?p=101#comment-40202</guid>
		<description>That's nonsense. If what you're saying were true, I could take out a loan for $10,000, default on the loan &lt;i&gt;immediately&lt;/i&gt;, and the bank wouldn't be harmed by it at all.

Furthermore, all this "brand new money" being conjured "directly out of thin air" every time someone takes out a loan would have the same economic effect as the government printing large sums of money: runaway inflation.

How loans &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; work is that the bank is loaning out the money that is being deposited with them by people with savings accounts. But there's a limit: the bank can't loan out more money than they actually have, minus a certain percentage that they keep in reserve (the "fractional reserve" of Fractional Reserve Banking). If the bank loans money to someone who defaults on their loan, they have actually &lt;i&gt;lost money&lt;/i&gt;.

What you may be talking about is the "money creation" effect of repeated loans (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_creation for a chart that explains it pretty well), but that doesn't create any &lt;i&gt;actual&lt;/i&gt; money, it just makes that money circulate more widely. And each bank is limited in what they can loan out to the amount they actually &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt;. So it's in the bank's best interest to loan money to people who will actually repay it, and that's why Wachovia's offer is foolish: the only people foolish enough to &lt;i&gt;take&lt;/i&gt; a loan at 50% interest are the kinds of people who will never repay their loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nonsense. If what you&#8217;re saying were true, I could take out a loan for $10,000, default on the loan <i>immediately</i>, and the bank wouldn&#8217;t be harmed by it at all.</p>
<p>Furthermore, all this &#8220;brand new money&#8221; being conjured &#8220;directly out of thin air&#8221; every time someone takes out a loan would have the same economic effect as the government printing large sums of money: runaway inflation.</p>
<p>How loans <i>actually</i> work is that the bank is loaning out the money that is being deposited with them by people with savings accounts. But there&#8217;s a limit: the bank can&#8217;t loan out more money than they actually have, minus a certain percentage that they keep in reserve (the &#8220;fractional reserve&#8221; of Fractional Reserve Banking). If the bank loans money to someone who defaults on their loan, they have actually <i>lost money</i>.</p>
<p>What you may be talking about is the &#8220;money creation&#8221; effect of repeated loans (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_creation" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_creation</a> for a chart that explains it pretty well), but that doesn&#8217;t create any <i>actual</i> money, it just makes that money circulate more widely. And each bank is limited in what they can loan out to the amount they actually <i>have</i>. So it&#8217;s in the bank&#8217;s best interest to loan money to people who will actually repay it, and that&#8217;s why Wachovia&#8217;s offer is foolish: the only people foolish enough to <i>take</i> a loan at 50% interest are the kinds of people who will never repay their loan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I will no longer do business with Wachovia Bank by imafraidyoudontquiteunderstandhowitworks</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2009/07/01/why-i-will-no-longer-do-business-with-wachovia-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-40133</link>
		<dc:creator>imafraidyoudontquiteunderstandhowitworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/?p=101#comment-40133</guid>
		<description>Banks do not loan out money that they *have*.

When a bank makes a loan it conjures brand new money, directly out of thin air, in to your loan account. This is the magic of Fractional Reserve Banking.

So, a bank is not actually risking any of its capital... it is only 
considering the Opportunity Costs between the different loan possibilities that the loan sharks can think up.

The Mortgage or Loan Application becomes a BRAND NEW asset on the Bank's Balance Sheet.

It is good to be king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banks do not loan out money that they *have*.</p>
<p>When a bank makes a loan it conjures brand new money, directly out of thin air, in to your loan account. This is the magic of Fractional Reserve Banking.</p>
<p>So, a bank is not actually risking any of its capital&#8230; it is only<br />
considering the Opportunity Costs between the different loan possibilities that the loan sharks can think up.</p>
<p>The Mortgage or Loan Application becomes a BRAND NEW asset on the Bank&#8217;s Balance Sheet.</p>
<p>It is good to be king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A step-by-step SQLAlchemy tutorial by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/05/04/a-step-by-step-sqlalchemy-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-39452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/05/04/a-step-by-step-sqlalchemy-tutorial/#comment-39452</guid>
		<description>There are many, many changes from ver. 0.2 to ver. 0.5.5 and I'm afraid your tutorial is no longer relevant as many modules have been deleted and I can't find equivalents within the SQLAlchemy documentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many, many changes from ver. 0.2 to ver. 0.5.5 and I&#8217;m afraid your tutorial is no longer relevant as many modules have been deleted and I can&#8217;t find equivalents within the SQLAlchemy documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A step-by-step SQLAlchemy tutorial by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/05/04/a-step-by-step-sqlalchemy-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-39451</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/05/04/a-step-by-step-sqlalchemy-tutorial/#comment-39451</guid>
		<description>Your SQLAlchemy tutorial is written for version 0.2.  I have version 0.5.5.  Are you going to update yout tutorial for version 0.5.5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your SQLAlchemy tutorial is written for version 0.2.  I have version 0.5.5.  Are you going to update yout tutorial for version 0.5.5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making SVN trust a new root CA certificate by Allen Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/12/01/making-svn-trust-a-new-root-ca-certificate/comment-page-1/#comment-38946</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/12/01/making-svn-trust-a-new-root-ca-certificate/#comment-38946</guid>
		<description>I tried this; it doesn't work for me.

In my case, I have created my own root certificate (I am serving as my own CA).  Then, I created a server certificate signed by the root CA certificate.  I imported the root CA certificate into Firefox on another client, and it all works beautifully.

But when I tell SVN, via the .subversion/servers file, to trust my root CA certificate as a certificate authority, it still says my server's certificate is not issued by a trusted authority!

Any clues as to what is going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this; it doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
<p>In my case, I have created my own root certificate (I am serving as my own CA).  Then, I created a server certificate signed by the root CA certificate.  I imported the root CA certificate into Firefox on another client, and it all works beautifully.</p>
<p>But when I tell SVN, via the .subversion/servers file, to trust my root CA certificate as a certificate authority, it still says my server&#8217;s certificate is not issued by a trusted authority!</p>
<p>Any clues as to what is going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PCI ID viewer for Windows by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/02/02/pci-id-viewer-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-38894</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/02/02/pci-id-viewer-for-windows/#comment-38894</guid>
		<description>These are useful because Win9x doesn't provide the IDs, unlike NT-series Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are useful because Win9x doesn&#8217;t provide the IDs, unlike NT-series Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making SVN trust a new root CA certificate by Colin Wetherbee</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/12/01/making-svn-trust-a-new-root-ca-certificate/comment-page-1/#comment-38657</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Wetherbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/2006/12/01/making-svn-trust-a-new-root-ca-certificate/#comment-38657</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article!

With respect to verifying the fingerprint of the certificate, I believe your method isn't quite right.  That is, "openssl sha1 foo.crt" will return the hash of the contents of the file, whereas "openssl x509 -noout -in foo.crt -fingerprint" will return the fingerprint of the certificate contained in the file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article!</p>
<p>With respect to verifying the fingerprint of the certificate, I believe your method isn&#8217;t quite right.  That is, &#8220;openssl sha1 foo.crt&#8221; will return the hash of the contents of the file, whereas &#8220;openssl x509 -noout -in foo.crt -fingerprint&#8221; will return the fingerprint of the certificate contained in the file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About me by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/about-me/comment-page-1/#comment-38520</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmunn.com/wordpress/about-me/#comment-38520</guid>
		<description>Hey Robin, Nice to see you're serving Him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robin, Nice to see you&#8217;re serving Him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating - is it right for Christians? by desiree may at Christian dating</title>
		<link>http://www.geekforgod.com/2005/10/26/dating-is-it-right-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-38492</link>
		<dc:creator>desiree may at Christian dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekforgod.com/?p=41#comment-38492</guid>
		<description>For me of course it does dating is right for christian not only christian it is where we can meet our partner that God would give. and maybe it will make our faith stronger for the name of God. thanks for the post and much love and thanks again.


&lt;a href="http://www.christiandarlings.com/i/?a=43" rel="nofollow"&gt;desireemay&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me of course it does dating is right for christian not only christian it is where we can meet our partner that God would give. and maybe it will make our faith stronger for the name of God. thanks for the post and much love and thanks again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.christiandarlings.com/i/?a=43" rel="nofollow">desireemay</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
